Skip to main content

Pristina Postcard

On Tuesday 17 February 2009 the new Republic of Kosova celebrated its first birthday. The celebrations in the capital, Pristina, were relatively low key. Walking in Rruga Nënë Terezë or throughout the rest of the Qendra, or even in the other, less central districts of the city, one could not but notice the festive mood. A sea of Kosovar and Albanian flags, interspersed with a few American and British ones, hanging from street poles, or attached on car boots and shop fronts added lively colour to the otherwise grim town. Families strolling in the town’s boulevards, street vendors displaying and noisily promoting their wares around Rruga Ilir Konusheci and beyond recreated a pleasant Sunday, festive yet mundane feel. The busier Bill Clinton Boulevard was sometimes gridlocked as hooting cars with Kosovar flags excitedly moved up and down.

But, leaving these manifestations aside, the occasion was a low key affair. The Kosovo assembly met to commemorate and celebrate the declaration of independence and heard Prime Minister Hashim Thaci recount the achievements since independence: ‘The year we left behind was a year of achievement and of pride. It was a year of historic success for our country’.

For those visiting today’s Kosovo, the day to day reality would make it difficult to accept Thaci’s statement at face value: of the UN's 192 countries, only 54 have recognized the new republic. Five EU member states have yet to recognize it despite the fact that EULEX, an EU mission has undertaken to support Kosovo’s route to complete sovereignty and independence in addition to Serbia, Russia, China, India and Bosnia. On the very anniversary of Kosovo’s declaration of independence, angry voices from Serb enclaves north of the Ibar river and from Serbia were reminding that independence is still contested from within and without - MPs from the Serbian parliament in Belgrade expressed their solidarity towards Kosovo’s Serbian minority by visiting Zvecan and attending a session of the Kosovo Serbian assembly based there while the moderate Serbian President Boris Tadić repeated in no uncertain terms the official take that Serbia would never recognise the independence of its former province and would defend its ‘legitimate rights by legal and diplomatic means, not force’. Tense divisions and mutual suspicion remain in place not only in northern Kosovo, where local Serbs live cushioned from the reality of an independent Kosovo, but also in the dozens of enclaves and mixed areas in the South. Serbia’s policy of supporting the northern enclaves and providing services to the Serbs living in there as if nothing had changed in its former province directly challenges Kosovar sovereignty and makes an integration solution much more improbable.

And, although everyday life has considerably improved over the past few years, back in Pristina one needs to look no further than to the still faltering and rationed electricity provision to understand that normality is still a long way away. There is indeed, plenty of ground for pessimism and apprehension.

However, if one casts a closer look at the year that passed since independence, it is possible to find reasons for some guarded optimism. With the exception of a few dramatic gestures from the usual suspects of the Serbian Radical Party, the celebrations were not met with the outrage that the original declaration of independence back in 2008 had been received in Serbia and Serb regions within Kosovo itself. There was not a repeat of the chaos – largely orchestrated - that ensued the declaration of independence all over Serbia back in 2008 and, although negative, most official statements stressed that Serbia remains committed to pursuing its rights through all legal means at its disposal. This represents a sea change in Serbian politics, the culmination of incremental changes over many years. In the course of last year, Serbian voters opted for a more moderate politics as they shunned the Democratic party of Serbia and its leader Vojislav Koštunica. The Serbian Radical Party that enjoyed a marginal increase in its share of the vote and Koštunica’s Democratic Party of Serbia-New Serbia (which were decimated in the polls) nationalist bloc fell short of the number of seats needed to form a government, while Tadić’s pro-EU Democratic Party almost doubled its share of the vote finding itself comfortably ahead of the erstwhile popular Radical Party (SRS). In September 2008, the SRS itself felt the strain of its anti-European, isolationist policies as its de facto leader Tomislav Nikolić and many of the party’s prominent cadres formed the Progressive Party after a disagreement with its leader Vojislav Šešelj, currently held in Hague, over the party’s European policies.

Serbia today remains adamant that Kosovo is an integral part of its territory but it slowly looks forward towards European integration. It seems to be slowly adjusting to the new reality as it has been restoring relations with the countries that recognize Kosovo, stopped encouraging mass action over the breakaway province and no longer refuses entry to holders of passports bearing Kosovo border stamps.

It seems that on both sides of the contested border moderate and forward looking forces are working painstakingly dealing with the many challenges they are facing with pragmatism and perseverance. In Kosovo, the jubilation and euphoria prevalent on the anniversary of the declaration of independence did not degenerate in chauvinistic violence, while Serbia shows signs of coming to terms with the new realities in the Southern Balkans as it looks forward towards European membership. One thing is certain; much more effort will be required on both sides to overcome mutual suspicion and decades of antagonism. Serbian voters will need time to overcome Serbian nationalism’s martyr syndrome that has been inculcated to generation after generation for the past several decades and Kosovo Albanians will too need time to overcome the bitter memories of a repressed and marginalized generation. But the first steps have already been made and need to be recognized and supported … .

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Spyros Sofos: Bulgaria’s Blackmail is Unfair

  INTERVIEW     13.09.23 19 ПРЕГЛЕДИ                                         At a time when Macedonia is under strong international pressure concerning the constitutional changes, and the region is waiting to see whether it will be coupled to the European locomotive, external views become a dire need for the country to position itself on the right coordinates during the geopolitical developments that will not leave us unaffected. After the interview with the German journalist and specialist on the Balkans Michael Martens, we present to you another conversation, this time with  Spyros Sofos,  whose research at the London School of Economics and Political Science has focused, among other things, on social insecurity, identity and collective action, as well as populism in Southeast Europe. He says that Bulgarian elites playing the nationalist card poses the...

In memoriam or A Kurdish Woman in a Turkish Dystopia

As I came across today a set of deeply disturbing photographs of  Turkish soldiers having stripped off the clothes of a young Kurdish girl after killing her, posing with her naked body, shared on social media, I remembered  Klaus Theweleit's  book Männerphantasien (1977), translated in English ten years later as Male Fantasies . In this unique book, Theweleit, provides an insightful  analysis of the proto-fascist consciousness of the Freikorps fighters who roamed the Weimar Republic during the interwar period to fight communists and 'other' enemies. Their ambivalent but, at their core, deeply misogynistic attitudes were central in their worldview and eventually formed one of the cornerstones of national socialist ideology as it was eagerly adopted by the Nazi party and, later on, by state discourse and policy.  The Turkish state, waging war against its own Kurdish citizens allows and encourages similar fantasies to be enacted at the 'battleground' and but...

What’s next for Turkey after local elections put Erdoğan on notice

Published in The Conversation: April 16, 2024, 11.03am EDT The recent municipal elections in Turkey represented a significant defeat for President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, signalling  a potential shift in Turkey’s political landscape . For more than two decades, Erdoğan has extended his  control over the Turkish media ,  the judiciary  and the  state bureaucracy , establishing an uneven playing field and skewed elections. This time, though, his Justice and Development Party — known as AKP — and its coalition with the ultra-right wing Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) lost 15 key municipalities. Mansur Yavas, Ankara’s mayor and CHP presidential hopeful, gestures to supporters in Ankara on March 31, 2024.   (AP Photo/Ali Unal) After  a disastrous and divisive presidential campaign  in 2023, the opposition, led by the secularist Republican People’s Party (CHP), assumed control of crucial municipal and provincial jurisdictions on March 31, 2024. The CHP, ...