Skip to main content

11 December 2009: Turkey's Constitutional Court bans the pro-Kurdish Demokratik Toplum Partisi



Following a lawsuit filed by Chief Public Prosecutor Abdurrahman Yalcinkaya on November 16, 2007, the Turkish Constitutional Court has decided yesterday to shut down the Demokratik Toplum Partisi (Democratic Society Party) due to the party’s alleged links with the  PKK. Following 9-hour deliberations on the fourth day of the case, Constitutional Court President Haşim Kılıç said that its members voted unanimously to close down the DTP as it became a focal point of acts against the indivisible integrity of the state.

The result of this controversial decision is that, yet again, voices advocating human rights protection for Turkish Kurds are stifled, and the largest pro-Kurdish political force that had made considerable inroads in the Turkish political system by wining in nine provinces in the 2009 local elections is now seriously impaired. Thirty seven DTP members, including DTP Chairman Ahmet Türk and MP Aysel Tuğluk were banned from politics for five years. The rump parliamentary group that survived the sweeping effects of this decision has now been stripped of its parliamentary group rights. Already the news is being received with apprehension in Turkey’s Southeastern, largely Kurdish-populated provinces. On occasion, apprehension has given way to violent expressions of frustration as sporadic news from the Hakkari province indicate.

As it has been pointed out by several commentators the ban on the DTP is certain to undermine confidence in the democratic process and the government's current reform initiative. Turkey’s Prime Minister himself warned that a decision to effectively exclude Kurdish politicians from the country’s parliament could "push them toward illegal action" and bring them closer to PKK. The fact is that the voices that have emerged from the DTP have been marked by moderation. The leader of the banned party said that Turkey could not resolve problems by banning political parties and added that problems would be resolved through dialogue and logic. However he also warned that the obstruction of democratic politics will deepen a sense of hopelessness and voicelessness for many of Turkey's citizens.

Clearly, the Political Parties Law (Law No. 2820/1983), which was used in the case against the DTP as well the earlier attempt of the prosecutors to close down the governing AKP, proves to be a major inhibitor to the development of a genuinely democratic political system. Not only is it a deeply undemocratic instrument that treats the Turkish electorate with suspicion but also it constitutes a distorting and destabilizing factor in Turkish politics. It is a ‘legal’ means of bringing about changes that in the past were the product of the mobilization of the tanks in military coups or ultimata. In the longer term, it hinders the process of integration of political forces and the diverse views they bring into the political system.

The question is ‘for how long will Turkey’s judicial, military and bureaucratic establishment be able to promote its modernization with restricted democratization model as the way forward of an immensely diverse and polyphonic society?'

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Spyros Sofos: Bulgaria’s Blackmail is Unfair

  INTERVIEW     13.09.23 19 ПРЕГЛЕДИ                                         At a time when Macedonia is under strong international pressure concerning the constitutional changes, and the region is waiting to see whether it will be coupled to the European locomotive, external views become a dire need for the country to position itself on the right coordinates during the geopolitical developments that will not leave us unaffected. After the interview with the German journalist and specialist on the Balkans Michael Martens, we present to you another conversation, this time with  Spyros Sofos,  whose research at the London School of Economics and Political Science has focused, among other things, on social insecurity, identity and collective action, as well as populism in Southeast Europe. He says that Bulgarian elites playing the nationalist card poses the risk of adding fuel to the fire in the region at a time when North Macedonia's access to the EU would render the contentious issu
Post a Comment
Read more

Whose Is This Song? (Chia e tazi pesen?) (2003)

My friend Mirjana has pointed out the existence of this very interesting documentary by Bulgarian director Adela Peeva. Listening to a song she knew since her childhood as Bulgarian being performed in Istanbul in Turkish, the director starts a small Balkan Odyssey through Turkey, Greece, Albania, Bosnia, Macedonia, Serbia only to end up at the Bulgarian-Turkish border region in her native Bulgaria. A song that apparently encapsulated common aesthetics and, more importantly, a shared yet diverse culture, where borrowing and translation make it impossible to argue about cultural ownership and origins proved to carry in it all that divides the peoples of Southeastern Europe. Not only people tried to claim it as exclusive property of their own nation but they often angrily dismissed counterclaims as nothing more than theft. It reminded me Freud's remarks about the 'narcissism of minor differences', the accentuation of antagonism towards those who look, sound and feel so similar
Post a Comment
Read more